The links provided in Noah's article are helpful in showing where Noah got his information from and made it easier to see how he developed his opinion. Most of the links were very informative, but the links to sites like Barnes & Noble seemed fairly irrelevant. I would use the links if they helped clarify my case and were pertinent to my argument. Used correctly, they can be very helpful to the reader. Noah does argue his claim persuasively. Probably one of the most persuasive parts of his article was the logical argument in which he uses the definitions of plagiarism and also the comparisons of the quotations from her first book and their sources. It was really easy to see how closely her work resembled the work of her sources.
After reading this article, I realize that I have to be extremely careful of citing my sources correctly and thoroughly. It also almost scares me that I will not be citing sources correctly, so I now know that I am going to have to take extra time to check over my paper and make sure that I have not made any citing mistakes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment